Minnesota Lemon Law Rights Consumer Guide

This guide contains a good explanation of the Minnesota lemon law statute, including the Minnesota lemon law definition and its presumptions. Read this guide, and if you have more questions about your rights under the Minnesota automobile lemon law or the lemon law process generally, or you if want free help seeking remedies under the Minnesota lemon law on new cars or the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, click to connect with a Minnesota lemon law attorney for a free lemon law case review Simply put, whenever you need help with the Minnesota car lemon law, this Website is your one stop lemon law infosource. This Guide was compiled by the Minnesota Office of the Attorney General to explain your Minnesota Lemon law rights and is brought to you here courtesy of CarLemon.

Popularly known as the “lemon law”, Minnesota’s motor vehicle warranty statue was created to help protect you when you buy or lease a car, pickup truck, or van, which is still under the original manufacturer’s warranty. The law is not intended to eliminate all problems you will ever encounter with your vehicle. What it does do is require manufacturer’s to honor the time and mileage provisions of their written warranties. And, it provides special arbitration, refund and replacement provisions for vehicles which are considered to be real “lemons”.

The Minnesota lemon law covers new motor vehicles purchased or leased in Minnesota. It also covers used vehicles which are still under the original manufacturer’s warranty. These cars must be used at least 40 percent of the time for personal, family, or household purposes. (Leased vehicles are covered by the law if the lease term is longer than four months.)

The first report of a defect must occur within the warranty period, or two years, whichever comes first. If you have continuing problems with the same defect, however, you can still make a claim until the end of the third year.

The manufacturer or its authorized dealer must repair a motor in accordance with the terms of the warranty, even after the manufacturer’s warranty has expired, if:

1. The motor vehicle has a defect or problem which is covered by the warranty; and,
2. The problem has been reported by the vehicle’s owner within the warranty period, or within two years after after delivery of the vehicle, whichever comes first.

The law has special refund and replacement provisions for cars that have substantial defects or problems, commonly called “lemons”. Under the law, if the manufacturer or the authorized dealer has been unable to repair a car’s problem after a “reasonable number of attempts,” the buyer or lessee may go through a manufacturer’s arbitration program, or to court, to seek a full refund of the car’s purchase price (minus a deduction for the use of the vehicle). The law considers “a reasonable number of attempts” to be any one of the following:

• Four or more unsuccessful attempts to repair the same defect; or
• One unsuccessful attempt to repair a defect which has caused the complete failure of the steering or braking system and which is likely to cause death or serious bodily injury; or,
• A car which has been out of service due to warranty repairs for 30 or more cumulative business days.

In each case the initial defect must occur within the warranty period, or two years, whichever comes first, but the manufacturer’s repair attempts may extend to the end of the third year. Even if you do meet one of the above categories, you may still have a lemon law claim, but it will be harder to prove.

Be aware that the manufacturer does not have to make a refund or replace the vehicle if:

• The problem does not substantially impair the use or market value of the vehicle; or,
• The problem is the result of abuse, neglect or unauthorized modifications or alterations of the vehicle.

Just because a repair shop has made a number of unsuccessful attempts to fix your car you are not automatically eligible for a refund or replacement vehicle. You must first:

Write to the manufacturer, zone representative or authorized dealer notifying them of the problem. Specifically state that your car is a lemon and that you want a buy-back under the lemon law. This does two things:

1. It gives the company an opportunity to fix the defect (the manufacturer gets one more chance to fix the defect after notification); and,
2. It lets the company know you plan to use Minnesota’s lemon law if the defect is not properly repaired.

Try to resolve the problem through the manufacturer’s automobile dispute arbitration program.

The manufacturer may require you to first go through the arbitration program before filing a lawsuit under the lemon law. Check with the manufacturer or the Minnesota Attorney General’s Consumer Division if you have questions about a manufacturer’s arbitration program.

If you are awarded a refund under the terms of the lemon law, the manufacturer must refund:

1. The full purchase price of the vehicle, or the amount you actually paid on your lease. However, for either a purchased or leased vehicle, the manufacturer may deduct a reasonable allowance for the time that you were able to use the vehicle. This deduction cannot exceed 10 cents per mile or 10 percent of the purchase price, whichever is less;
2. The cost of certain options installed by the manufacturer or dealer;
3. Sales tax;
4. License fees;
5. Registration fees;
6. Reimbursement for towing; and,
7. Rental expenses.

Note: If you are awarded a replacement vehicle, you have the option of receiving a refund instead.

Automobile manufacturers doing business in Minnesota must offer consumers an arbitration program which considers consumers’ warranty related disputes.

A manufacturer’s arbitration program provides consumers a fast and simple way to resolve disputes. Arbitrators can consider arguments based on the lemon law. But, an arbitrator is not a judge and is not required to apply the law the way a court would.

If the manufacturer requires it, consumers must first go through the manufacturer’s arbitration program before filing a lawsuit under the lemon law. You may not have to wait until all the lemon law criteria are met before going through arbitration, but you might have a stronger case if all the criteria are met.

In fact, you may not even want to discuss the lemon law in arbitration if your car does not meet the lemon law criteria.

The consumer has certain rights during the arbitration process:

• Lemon law information. You and the arbitrator(s) must receive a copy of the Lemon Law Brochure from the manufacturer’s arbitration program.
• Lemon law arguments. You may make any arguments to the arbitrator(s) you think necessary to support your complaint, including those based on the lemon law. The arbitrator(s) cannot be discouraged or prohibited from considering your arguments.
• Documents. You are entitled to copies of all documents.
• Oral presentation. You must be given reasonable written notice of the arbitration and an opportunity to make an oral presentation to the arbitrator(s), unless you agree to a telephone conference or to submit the case on the basis of documents alone. If the case is based on documents alone, the manufacturer or dealer representative cannot participate in discussion or resolution of the dispute. You may get better results if you make a personal oral presentation to the arbitrator(s).
• Independent appraisal. You must be given an adequate opportunity to get an independent appraisal, at your own cost, of any manufacturer claim that your vehicle does not have a problem or that your vehicle is operating within normal specifications.
• Repair attempts. You must be given a chance to inform the arbitrator(s) about the results of any recent repair attempts by the manufacturer.
• Service bulletins. You must be provided with, at reasonable cost, any technical service bulletin which the manufacturer knows directly applies to the specific mechanical problem being disputed.
• Attorney. You have the right to be represented by an attorney in the arbitration process. However, most arbitration participants appear before the arbitrator(s) without an attorney. Attorney’s fees for representation in arbitration are not recoverable under the lemon law.
• Arbitration decision. You are not bound by the decision of the arbitrator(s), unless you agree to be bound. In the past, manufacturers have agreed to be bound by the arbitration decision. If you are unhappy with an arbitration decision, you may wish to consult an attorney if you wish to file a lawsuit under the lemon law. The arbitration decision is admissible as nonbinding evidence in any subsequent legal action. If you wish to file an appeal of the arbitrator’s ruling in court, you must file in court within 30 days of the decision.
• Refund amount. If the arbitrator(s) decides you should receive a refund or replacement vehicle under the terms of the lemon law, then you are entitled to the same refunds and reimbursements you would have received had you won in court.
• Bad faith appeal. If a court determines that you or the manufacturer acted in bad faith when you appealed an arbitration decision, the party that wins in court may be entitled to receive three times the actual damages, plus attorney’s fees and court costs.

To prepare for a dispute you should:

1. Keep copies of all purchase orders, sales receipts, lease agreements, warranties, repair invoices, letters and other documents concerning your vehicle and any of its problems.
2. If your vehicle is in the shop for repairs for more than one day at a time, make sure that the repair invoice shows the date it was brought in and the date you were notified that it was ready to be returned.
3. If you think you are eligible for a refund or replacement vehicle, remember the law requires written notice be given to the manufacturer, zone representative or authorized dealer. You should send a letter by certified mail, with a return receipt requested. If you send the letter to the dealer, send a copy to the manufacturer and keep a copy for your records. You should include the following information in your letter:
   • Your name, address and telephone number.
   • The date you purchased or began leasing the automobile.
   • A list of defects and systems affected.
   • The number of times the vehicle has been subject to repairs for the same problem, and the dates of the repairs.
   • A statement that the defect still exists as of the date of the letter.
   • A reference to the lemon law (Minnesota Statutes, section 325F.665) and a statement that you will pursue a replacement or refund claim under this law if the vehicle is not made to conform to the warranty.
   • A request for information about the company’s arbitration program.

Remember, the refund and replacement provisions of the lemon law are intended to provide a replacement or a refund only in the cases of the most serious defects ¾ faults which seriously impair the use or market value of the vehicle, or faults which involve life-threatening failures of the braking and steering systems.

If you feel you must bring a lawsuit under the lemon law for a refund or replacement vehicle, you should consult an attorney (you may be eligible to recover the attorney’s fees if you win). The law allows you to file suit any time within three years of the date of the original delivery of the vehicle, if you first reported the defect within the warranty period, or two years, whichever comes first. As of April 1995, if you go through a manufacturer’s arbitration program, you have six months to appeal in court. The company has only 30 days to appeal in court.