North Carolina Lemon Laws and the federal Lemon Law (the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act) provide for compensation to North Carolina consumers of defective automobiles and trucks and other vehicles and products including motorcycles, RV’s, boats, computers and other consumer appliances and products. To qualify under the North Carolina Lemon Law or the federal Lemon Law, you must generally have a product that suffered multiple repair attempts under the manufacturer’s factory warranty. Lemon Law compensation can include a refund, replacement or cash compensation. If you think you qualify for a Lemon Law, click here for a free North Carolina Lemon Law case review or for an immediate evaluation, simply fax your repair records to 866-773-6152. An experienced Lemon Law attorney will personally review your inquiry and records and quickly contact you for a free consultation.
For other useful North Carolina Lemon Law information, click here to visit the North Carolina section of our State Lemon Laws summaries page. Or just keep reading below for the entire North Carolina Lemon Law, or click here to read the federal lemon law<.
North Carolina Lemon Law Your Rights as a new Car Buyer or Lessee IntroductionThe 1987 General Assembly enacted a “lemon law” to give better remedies to North Carolina consumers who buy or lease a new car that is a “lemon.” The lemon law (a) defines clearly what cars are lemons, (b) spells out exactly the relief to which the purchaser of, and consumer leasing a lemon is entitled and (c) provides that a manufacturer who unreasonably refuses to grant to the buyer of or consumer leasing a lemon the relief to which he is entitled must pay the consumer triple damages and attorney’s fees.
What Vehicles are Covered?The lemon law does not apply just to passenger cars. It covers any new motor vehicle other than a house trailer, provided that the vehicle does not have a gross vehicle weight of 10,000 pounds or more. Thus, the law covers pickup trucks, motorcycles and most vans, as well as cars. And the purpose for which the vehicle is purchased or leased is not relevant. But, any cars purchased or leased prior to October 1, 1987 is not covered by the lemon law.
When is a Car a Lemon?A vehicle is a lemon if it is “seriously defective” and could not be repaired in a “reasonable number of attempts.”
Seriously DefectiveA serious defect is “any defect or condition or series of defects or conditions which substantially impair the value of the motor vehicle to the consumer.” The defect must be in a part of the car covered by the manufacturer’s express warranty, but it is not limited to things which make the car drivable. Leaks, lack of air conditioning or heat or serious paint problems, to name a few, could be defects which substantially impair the value of the vehicle to the buyer.
Also, in order for the vehicle to be seriously defective, the defect must have appeared within the express warranty period. The lemon law requires all vehicles to have an express warranty of at least twelve months or twelve thousand miles. If the express warranty period exceeds 24 months or 24,000 miles, the consumer’s right to a replacement or refund is limited to defects which first occur within that first 24 months or 24,000. For warranty defects which occur after within the warranty period, but after the lemon law’s 24 month/24,000 mile limitation, the consumer would have to seek compensation for failure to repair if the vehicle is not repaired after a reasonable number of attempts. Compensation for failure to repair is the difference in the value of the car as it is and the value it would have if repaired, or the cost of repairs.
Note that the express warranty on a new motor vehicle stated in a number of miles begins from the date the vehicle is delivered to the consumer. For example, if a demonstration model with a 24,000 mile warranty has 4,000 miles on it when the consumer buys it, the warranty will remain in effect until the vehicle has 28,000 miles on it.
Reasonable Number of AttemptsThe law presumes that “a reasonable number of attempts have been undertaken” to fix the defects if:
If the manufacturer has not fixed the vehicle after a reasonable number of attempts, the purchaser or leasing consumer is entitled to choose a comparable, new replacement vehicle or a refund. The statute is not specific as to what is a comparable new replacement vehicle, though it would clearly include an identical make and model. However, the consumer may choose a refund instead of a replacement. The statute is very specific about how to determine the amount of the refund.
A purchaser is entitled to a refund of:
A leasing consumer is entitled to a refund of:
Because it is the manufacturer that is responsible for the vehicle, the leasing must recover from the manufacturer, not the lessor. The lessor also may recover from the manufacturer. Remedies available to the lessor are described at G.S. § 20-351.3(b)(2).
The statute defines a “reasonable allowance for use” as that amount directly attributable to use by the consumer prior to his first report of the defect to the manufacturer, its agent, or its authorized dealer, and during any subsequent period when the vehicle is not out of service because of repair. “Reasonable allowance is presumed to be the cash price of the vehicle multiplied by a fraction having as its denominator 100,000 miles and its numerator the number of miles on the vehicle attributed to the consumer.” For example, if the cash price of the vehicle was $20,000 and the purchaser or leasing consumer had driven the car 10,000 miles before getting a refund, the owner would be entitled to the full refund, less $20,000 (10,000/100,000), or $2,000.
What Steps Should I Take?Many auto manufacturers have established dispute resolution programs for customers with warranty problems. Some require you to use these programs before you go to court. Some do not. Read your warranty to see if the manufacturer has established a “dispute resolution” program and if you must use it before going to court. Ford and Chrysler operate their own programs. As of October 1, 1992, the following manufacturers participate in an arbitration program run by the Better Business Bureau: Acura, Audi, General Motors (all divisions), Honda, Infiniti, Isuzu, Nissan, Saab/Scania, Saturn, Sterling, and Volkswagen. If your warranty requires you to use the dispute resolution program, follow the instructions in the warranty to start the procedure. If your warranty does not require dispute resolution, decide if you want to try it.
Seeing a LawyerIf arbitration fails, or if you did not have to use arbitration and did not want to, you should consider seeing a private attorney. Many people are reluctant to do this, but we encourage it. Some manufacturers, unfortunately, do not take consumer complaints too seriously until they hear from an attorney. Your attorney can advise you best what to do with the car and whether to stop making payments.
The lemon law provides that you can recover triple damages and attorney’s fees if the manufacturer is found to have unreasonably refused to resolve your complaint.
You are, of course, welcome to contact the Consumer Protection Section of the Attorney General’s Office. The Attorney General’s Office can provide you or your attorney with useful information, or we can try to mediate your complaint. However, it cannot act as private counsel to particular individuals. The Attorney General is interested in receiving information from individuals regarding how manufacturers handle these matters because the Attorney General can sue to enforce the lemon law when the public interest requires it.
North Carolina Department of Justice
Consumer Protection Section
P.O. Box 629
Raleigh, NC 27602-0629
Telephone: (919) 716-6000
Fax: (919) 716-6050