CarLemon.com
Home Find A Lemon Law Lawyer Manufacturer Recalls & Bulletins Vehicle Repair Logs & Tips Free Lemon Law Case Review

Free Lemon Law
Case Evaluation...

Click for a FREE Lemon
Law Case Review >>


State Lemon Law
Summaries...

Click for a highlight of your
State's Lemon Law >>


State Lemon Law
Statutes...

Click to read your State's
Complete Lemon Law >>


FREE Lemon Law
Lawyer...

Click Here >>

Friday, September 5, 2008

Woman Files Texas Lemon Law Claim

Orange, Texas -- Claiming she was sold a lemon, Terri Jones has filed suit against Harmon Chevrolet and General Motors Corp.

Jones' suit was filed Aug. 13 in Orange County District Court.

In her suit, Jones says she purchased a Chevy Equinox from Harmon Chevrolet on Aug. 18, 2006. During the first year of ownership, the vehicle's ignition switch allegedly malfunctioned on several occasions.

"Since owning the vehicle, and within the period of express warranty, the ignition switch … required replacement four times," the suit says.

"Prior to the expiration of the express warranty, plaintiff brought the vehicle to Harmon … for repair, and the defendants refused to honor the warranty."

Jones alleges both defendants are guilty of breaching their warranty and of violating the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

"The conduct of the defendants …. Was a proximate cause of plaintiff's economic damages," the suit says.

Jones is requesting a trial by jury and is represented by attorney Clay Dugas.

The case has been assigned to Judge Pat Clark, 128th Judicial District.

Case No. A-080316-c

Article by David Yates, Southeast Texas Record -

Labels: , ,

Monday, August 25, 2008

Branding Car Titles Of Lemons Is Now The Law in Minnesota

Call it the scarlet letter for certified clunkers.

This month, Minnesota got in step with a number of other states by requiring all vehicles that have been bought back by manufacturers under "lemon laws" to carry the distinction on their titles.

Lemon laws generally require carmakers to buy back a vehicle that's under warranty if it has critical or chronic defects.

Titles issued in Minnesota can already be "branded" if the vehicles have been drowned, salvaged from a total loss or rebuilt after a terrible accident. The titles feature such alarming designations as "FLOOD DAMAGED," "PRIOR SALVAGE," "REBUILT" and "RECONST."

But until this year, the Minnesota Driver and Vehicle Services agency had no authority to brand a car's title if it was part of a manufacturer buy-back in Minnesota or if it arrived from another state with that stigma, said Larry Ollila, vehicle services program director.

"It's something we put forward as an initiative because vehicles were coming in from other states with that brand," Ollila said. "We didn't have the ability to carry forward the brand. It's a consumer awareness issue.

Ollila said he didn't know how many vehicle titles in Minnesota would have to carry the stamp, although the first "LEMON LAW VEHICLE" brand went on a title on Aug. 1, the day the law went into effect.

The new law comes too late for Angela Lembo of Bloomington, who bought a 2003 Volkswagen Jetta last year. The Jetta had been part of a lemon law buyback program in California, but by the time Lembo bought the car in Minnesota, the title didn't show it.

Lembo found out about the Jetta's checkered history only when she tried to resell it and the buyer made the discovery during a title search. She welcomes the new law.

"It's no different than buying a car with a salvage title," she said. "You know what you're getting into."

Article by James Eli Shiffer

Minneapolis StarTribune.com

Labels: , , ,

Monday, August 18, 2008

Sour deal? Buyers didn't get Lemon Law disclosures

Seventy-nine customers who bought secondhand Hummers and Cadillac Escalades from a dealership in Fife didn't get all the legal disclosures about the vehicles' history, according to the state Attorney General's Office.

The AG's office reached a settlement Friday with McCann Motors in which the auto dealership agreed to notify the customers of what happened and offer to work out a suitable resolution. The dealership did not admit wrongdoing but agreed to pay $12,000 in state attorneys' fees and costs.

Buyers didn't get a notice that the cars were reacquired by their manufacturer under California's Lemon Law before being resold in Washington, the office said.

If you buy a car in Washington, the state's Lemon Law and other consumer laws protect you by requiring certain disclosures about the vehicle.

"The price of prestige probably was too high for some of these buyers who paid up to $50,000 for luxury cars but may have negotiated differently had they received the required Lemon Law disclosures," consumer protection division chief Doug Walsh said.

The buyers signed paperwork that included a notice that the cars had been repurchased under a California Lemon buyback law, but they didn't get special disclosures that the state contends would have made it more obvious that these cars could have potential problems, he added.

State law requires that a bright yellow flier be placed in the window of the car that reads "Lemon Law Resale Notice of Nonconformity or Serious Safety Defect" and that customers get documents telling them that the title will include a statement that the vehicle was previously returned to the manufacturer and this may affect the vehicle's future resale value.

The state alleged that failure to provide those disclosures violated state laws.

Article by Phuong Cat Le, Consumer Smarts Blog

SeattlePI.com

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

Warranty Works on Front End Shake

Bradley Joyce was preparing for grave disappointment.

Shortly after purchasing an $8,724 Thruxton motorcycle from Clinton Cycles in Camp Springs, the geographic information systems manager said he felt "a significant and dangerous feeling wobble" in the bike at speeds over 45 miles per hour.

Several attempts to fix the wobble got him nowhere. He was without his bike for more than a month. Joyce feared that his journey into warranty hell would only lead to no good and an eventual lemon law claim.

Warranties make my head hurt. In most cases that end up here, companies flub the job and tick off the customer. Loopholes in the law, or the lack of any law, further fail consumers. But Clinton Cycles and manufacturer Triumph USA proved Joyce wrong, and Maryland law would have protected him had the situation gone terribly awry.

Excuse my joy. It's not every day I get good consumer news like that, especially after several bleak moments for Joyce.

The Baltimore resident's problem started on July 21 when he took his bike into Pete's Cycles in Fullerton, an authorized Triumph dealer, for a 500-mile initial inspection. Joyce asked the service department to take a closer look for a shake in the front end.

"They balanced the front wheel," said Joyce, who paid $260 for the service visit. "It didn't help."

Joyce called Pete's back to tell them the fix didn't work. They put him on a waiting list. A call back to the original dealer that sold him the bike, Clinton, got Joyce an appointment right away.

On June 28, Joyce dropped the bike off and Clinton diagnosed the problems as "a head bearing in need of adjustment." They tightened it. Joyce started to take the bike home - and turned back around. "The problem was still there," he said.

On July 3, he called Clinton to check on the bike's progress. No one had looked at it yet. That evening, the dealership called to say it swapped the wheel out, but the problem persisted. So Clinton did a complete head bearing replacement under warranty.

The wobble won the day.

On the fifth attempt, even as Joyce's patience was worn microscopically thin, Clinton disassembled the fork tubes, which deal with the front-end suspension and how the bike handles. And still, wobble - 5, Clinton - 0.

At wit's end, Joyce wrote a letter to Triumph's head of customer relations, Peter Carleo. He ended the e-mail by saying that if the problem was not resolved, "I intend to turn the matter over to the state lemon laws."

Lemon laws are great if your vehicle is protected. Not all lemon laws are equal, though. Depending on which state you live in, motorcycles and recreational vehicles may not qualify.

"Most people think they are automatically covered," said Ronald Burdge, an Ohio attorney who specializes in lemon laws. "The amount of lemon law coverage you have might depend on the number of wheels you have. Four wheels? You're probably covered. Three? Probably not. Two wheels, it's 50-50. A lot of states don't cover motorcycles. It makes no logical sense."

The beauty of state lemon laws is that most clearly define what qualifies your vehicle, such as how long and how many times the vehicle needs repair work for the same problem, or specific problems. If you live in a state where your motorcycle or RV doesn't qualify, there is a federal consumer law that could provide some protection, but the presumptions aren't clearly defined.

Luckily for Joyce, Maryland's law does protect motorcycles (but not RVs). Under our law, four unsuccessful repairs or 30 calendar days out of service or one unsuccessful repair of a braking or steering system within 15 months or 15,000 miles allows a lemon law claim.

But here's the even better part of this story.

On the sixth and final attempt, Clinton was set to replace the entire front end of the bike. The dealership called in its master mechanic, who decided to swap out the front wheel one more time.

The wobble vanished, and so did Joyce's consternation - especially when Clinton charged him nothing for any of the 36 hours of work or parts, which would have cost thousands under normal circumstances.

"Ultimately, the people down at Clinton Cycles worked very hard to get my problem fixed," Joyce said. "The bike rides perfectly now."

There are a number of really good lessons here.

•Check that your state lemon law covers what you're buying. If it doesn't, see if a neighboring state has a stronger law that protects nonresidents and consider buying your motorcycle, RV or disability van (which is afforded even fewer protections) from there.

•Deal with the dealer you originally bought your vehicle from, so that your problems are a priority to them.

•Stay on top of the problem. Joyce never let his concern go for more than a week without checking in with Clinton, and he was always politely persistent.

•Go over heads if the problem persists. Joyce wrote a letter to Triumph's Carleo, who made sure that the dealership was communicating with the manufacturer's techs to diagnose the problem. Carleo, who is based in Georgia, was also prepared to fly to Maryland to help if need be.

"Some of the timing problem was based on the techs not finding what the problem was," Carleo said. "Mechanical conditions can be hard to diagnose. These things can take time. We want to rule everything out. Had the mechanical conditions not been resolved, we would have replaced the bike if need be. We take customer satisfaction seriously at Triumph."

Which bring us to the final lesson, which is that a couple of failed attempts to fix a mechanical problem might not necessarily mean that you're getting jacked around. But be sure to keep all correspondence, notes and maintenance records with the dealer and manufacturer and document the time, date and notes for every call. If you fear after a first or second fix that you own a lemon, send a certified letter to the manufacturer.

Do exercise patience, but don't be taken for a fool.

Article by Dan Thanh Dang, Baltimore Sun.com

Labels: , ,

Monday, July 28, 2008

AZ Probes Complaints Against Auto Dealership

Selling damaged vehicles. Breaking rules. Calling cops on customers who complain.

A Tucson car lot managed by ex-convicts did all those things and now is under state investigation for unlawful business practices. Regulators are probing reports that the dealership sold a wrecked vehicle that was legally unfit to drive, and that staffers repeatedly put inaccurate vehicle information on state records, violating Arizona law.

Wildcat Mitsubishi, 5200 E. Speedway, has been under state scrutiny since the Army banned local soldiers from buying cars there and at Wildcat's sister dealership, Ideal Automotive Group, 645 S. Highway 92 in Sierra Vista. The May ban followed complaints soldiers were threatened, cheated or misled.

Both dealerships also are under investigation for operating without state-required financing licenses for two years, as long as Wildcat has been open. The licenses help protect customers who disclose sensitive financial data in loan applications.

Already, the problems have led to a lawsuit, government complaints and police calls as dealership employees and customers report each other to authorities.

"A culture of contempt for their customers," is how Tom Collier, president of the Southern Arizona Better Business Bureau, described the attitude of the dealerships' owners.
Tucson lawyer Timothy Remick, who represents owners Richard and Pat Johnston of Hereford, said his clients value their customers and are working hard to fix any shortcomings.

He acknowledged Wildcat has ex-convicts on staff, which is legal in Arizona but not in many other states. He also agreed the dealerships don't have proper licensing, and that Wildcat submitted inaccurate vehicle data to the state and sold a vehicle that wasn't legal to sell.
Each time those things occurred, he said, it was due to oversights, mistakes or ignorance of the law.

Ideal Automotive Group of Sierra Vista has no connection to a Tucson business with a similar name, I-Deal Auto Sales, 2307 N. Stone Ave.

Wrong VINs
In five cases in 2007, detailed in documents obtained by the Arizona Daily Star, Wildcat employees entered inaccurate vehicle identification numbers on applications for temporary registration permits.

In one case, the wrong VIN caused the state to issue a permit for an unroadworthy vehicle, allowing it to be driven off the lot by a customer without raising a red flag in the state's computerized tracking setup.

"There is no way we would have issued a temporary registration permit for that vehicle if the real VIN had been entered into our system," said Cydney DeModica, a spokeswoman for the Arizona Department of Transportation's Motor Vehicle Division, which licenses auto sellers and is probing the incidents.

Michael Wilson of San Manuel bought the damaged truck from Wildcat and is still driving it, even though it's "falling apart," said Art Weiss, his attorney.

Wildcat acquired the 2005 Chevy Silverado at a local auto auction. Its frame was so bent that a previous insurer had declared it a writeoff, making it a salvage vehicle under state law.

"Salvage vehicles are often purchased by automotive professionals for the parts or for restoring the vehicle to driveable condition," said Remick, the dealership's lawyer.

No way, said Bailey Wood of the National Automobile Dealers Association, a Virginia-based trade group that represents about 20,000 new-vehicle dealerships nationwide.

"Dealers do not want salvage vehicles on their lots, period," he said. In fact, the trade group is pushing for a national database of salvage vehicles, so dealers and consumers don't unknowingly end up with them.

In Arizona, it is illegal to re-sell salvage vehicles on a car lot. They can be sold only after their titles are restored — after extensive repairs, state safety inspections and ample consumer warnings. A state inspection on Wilson's truck wasn't done until two months after the sale.
Remick said Wildcat didn't realize that state law bans the retail sale of salvage vehicles.

"Wildcat now knows they were wrong," he said in an e-mail to the Star.

He said Wilson was told the truck was salvage before he bought it — which Wilson denies. Either way, the sale was illegal, DeModica said.

Remick said Wilson was offered a full refund. That offer materialized only after Wilson hired a lawyer, Weiss said. Wilson is suing because he also wants Wildcat to pay his legal costs.
The case is expected to go to arbitration in August.

State aid
Some customers have gone to government agencies for help.

Tiffany Luckey of Tucson turned to Arizona's attorney general when Wildcat wouldn't give back her deposit after selling her a previously wrecked Mitsubishi Lancer, she said.

In January, the 22-year-old college student put down $843 on the car and was allowed to take it home pending financing. But it had problems, she said: The "check engine" light was always on, the car pulled to the right and the horn didn't work.

A few weeks later, Luckey said, the dealership called to say her car had a salvage title. Remick, the dealership lawyer, told the Star the car actually was a restored salvage vehicle that had passed state inspection.

Wildcat said she could return the car, so she did and asked for her deposit money. The salesman said the owner wasn't there to sign a check and told her to come back.
So she went back, repeatedly. The owner was never there.
"There was a time when I waited three hours," she said.
Luckey told the dealership she was going to the Better Business Bureau. Afterward, she said, employees hung up whenever she called.

She also complained to the attorney general. A few weeks later, a state official called to say she was getting her refund.

Remick said Wildcat intended to return the money all along. Luckey "would have been given that refund whether or not she had filed a complaint with the Attorney General's Office."

Since 2003, another state agency has intervened seven times to help Ideal customers who were left with vehicles they couldn't legally drive because the Sierra Vista dealership failed to provide license plates, registrations and titles on time, state officials say.

The customers turned to the MVD for help when their temporary registrations expired and weeks passed without any action by Ideal, said DeModica, the agency spokeswoman. Officials there contacted the dealership on behalf of customers to settle the issues, she said.

Remick couldn't be reached late Friday for comment on the timeliness problems.

Run-ins with regulators
ADOT's inspector general censured Wildcat in May 2007 for misusing temporary registration plates and for selling a vehicle without a proper title.

The agency issued a cease-and-desist order, telling the dealership to stop the practices or face further state action, including fines.

Similar state orders were issued against Ideal in 2005 for failing to forward a registration application to the state, and in 2006 for misuse of a dealer plate.

Remick said his clients weren't aware of those enforcement actions. He was aware of a court case involving alleged misuse of a dealer plate but said it was dismissed.

Both dealerships have run afoul of the Arizona Department of Financial Institutions. A state registry shows neither has a required license to finance vehicles.

Remick said that's because the Johnstons — who have been in the car-sales business for more than 15 years — forgot for the last two years to renew Ideal's license. Wildcat never had the license because the Johnstons didn't realize they needed a separate one for the Tucson site, he said. They intend to correct the oversights, he said.

Remick said his clients "were never notified that the payment was due or that the license had expired." The state says dealerships routinely are mailed three notices: one before expiration, one just afterward, and the last when a license is canceled for nonpayment.

Financing vehicles without a license can carry steep penalties: up to $5,000 a day for each violation.

An official at Mitsubishi's corporate office said he was unaware of such problems at the local dealerships.

The company doesn't make franchisees agree to formal standards or ethics, but they're expected to conduct business "legally and appropriately," said Dan Irvin, a spokesman for Mitsubishi Motors North America.

Ex-cons
Many dealerships weed out job applicants with criminal pasts, and many states require it. Remick said his clients don't do background checks because they believe in second chances for criminals who have served their time.

"Wildcat is truly an equal opportunity employer," he said.

Thus it came to pass that Wildcat's payroll last year included staffers with convictions including attempted aggravated assault with a weapon, threats and intimidation, weapons misconduct, possession of drug paraphernalia, and false reporting to law enforcement.

Despite the commitment to second chances, one Wildcat staffer with six criminal convictions was fired several months ago, after more than a year on the job.

Heath Johnston, 36, Wildcat's general manager and the son of its owners, was convicted in 2004 of attempted aggravated assault with a deadly weapon or dangerous instrument, for grazing a Fort Huachuca soldier with his truck after wrongly identifying the soldier as a participant in a bar fight Johnston had just left in Sierra Vista.

The soldier, who was not in uniform, jumped from the truck's path, but Johnston continued, hitting the victim's car and dragging it 50 feet before he left without checking on the soldier's welfare.

The soldier was too afraid of Johnston to go to court for the sentencing hearing in the felony case, he wrote to the judge.

"He almost killed me. I fear he will come back against me in the future," the letter said. "I am a U.S. Army soldier and I know dangerous situations."

Heath Johnston was sentenced to four years' probation and the two days in jail he'd already served and was ordered to pay the soldier's medical bills and other costs.

"He has fulfilled his obligation to society and has moved on with his life," Remick said.

Heath Johnston's 34-year-old brother, Beau Johnston — general manager of the family's Sierra Vista dealership — is awaiting trial on a felony charge of knowingly possessing stolen property valued at more than $25,000.

Police found a pilfered piece of heavy construction equipment — a 2004 John Deere tractor/excavator — in his backyard last year. Remick said his client is confident he will be exonerated. Beau Johnston told police he didn't know the machine was stolen.

In many states, people with criminal histories are banned from owning or working in auto dealerships. California, for instance, requires owners and staffers to be licensed, a vetting that disqualifies ex-cons.
Arizona requires background checks only for owners. Richard and Pat Johnston, owners of Wildcat and Ideal, have clean criminal records, so they qualify. And under state law, they can hire anyone they want, said DeModica of the MVD.

911 calls
Since Wildcat opened in 2006, the dealership and its customers have called police on each other at least nine times, sometimes alleging violence, Tucson Police Department records show.
While no convictions resulted, the records show how Wildcat was viewed by unhappy customers, and vice versa.

Former Davis-Monthan airman Chris Coleman had just been honorably discharged from the military when he went to Wildcat in February to buy a car. He ended up calling 911 from an office inside the dealership, saying he'd just been assaulted by general manager Heath Johnston.
Officers were greeted by Heath Johnston and Wildcat sales manager Jason Sackett. They said they suspected Coleman was not being candid about his finances, so they took him into an office and asked him to access his bank account online to prove he had money for a down payment. Coleman got upset, took a swing and had to be restrained, they said.

Coleman told police he was the one who'd been attacked. He said he'd just sat down to use the computer when Heath Johnston "pushed him to the ground and started hitting him," a police report said.
Coleman's injuries — minor abrasions on both hands and a forearm and a small cut on the top of his head — were photographed by police as potential evidence.

The dealership didn't want to press charges. Coleman wanted Johnston charged with assault, but no charges were filed "due to the lack of an independent witness," the police report said. Coleman couldn't be reached for comment.

Police calls to Wildcat began even before it formally opened in September 2006. In July that year, while final preparations were still in progress, Heath Johnston called 911 to report "trouble with a customer."

He told police a customer had been having problems with her car and that the dealership had not yet been able to resolve them. He said the woman lost her temper, swore, and knocked over a pile of papers on his desk.

Johnston wanted to prosecute so police charged the woman with disorderly conduct, trespassing and contributing to the delinquency of minors for using expletives in the presence of her children. All the charges later were dismissed.

Soldiers
Fort Huachuca has received about two dozen complaints from soldiers upset by the treatment they received at Wildcat and Ideal. That prompted its commander to take the rare step of banning soldiers from doing business there. The ban also covers a small used-car lot in Huachuca City owned by Ideal.

Army officials said the ban was necessary to protect soldiers, who move so frequently they often can't take cases to court if auto deals go sour. At least once, a deployed soldier was trying to deal with his car problems from Iraq, they said.

One of the Army complainants was 29-year-old Warrant Officer Cassie Story, a former instructor in the fort's unmanned-aerial-vehicle program now serving in Iraq.

Last year she bought a new Mitsubishi at Wildcat in Tucson. When the car had problems, Story took it for warranty service to Ideal, which also sells Mitsubishis.

She had a recurring problem with window tinting that had not hardened properly, gumming up the window mechanisms. When a phone surveyor called from Mitsubishi to see how she liked her new car, Story mentioned the window issue.

She said that when she went back to Ideal after work that day to pick up her car, general manager Beau Johnston was visibly angry.

"He told me if I ever filed any kind of complaint against his company again, that I would not be allowed to bring my car back for any kind of service," she said.

Story said a scuffle nearly erupted when another soldier began to fear for her safety. "The soldier who was with me wanted to step in and punch him," she said.

Remick, the Johnstons' lawyer, says it was Story, not Beau Johnston, who was out of line.
Remick said the phone surveyor had asked Story to limit her comments to work done by Ideal, which had not done the window tinting. Story "became enraged and difficult to deal with," he said. "At that point she became belligerent and accusatory."

Story's account is one of several similar complaints to Fort Huachuca.

Soldiers said they "were threatened with retribution," post spokeswoman Tanja Linton said. A commonly reported threat was "we will call the cops and have you charged with assault," Linton said.

Beau Johnston told the Star in May that some friction occurred when young soldiers applied for auto financing and were allowed to take vehicles home before final credit approvals were in.
If the soldiers came back as bad risks, the cars then were taken away or soldiers were asked to put down more money. That created so much ill will that the dealerships stopped letting soldiers take cars home before deals were final, he said.

Remick denied soldiers were threatened and said the Johnstons are making strides to increase good will between the dealerships and the Army. They are confident the ban will be lifted soon.
For example, he said, Ideal recently entered into a special arbitration arrangement with the Better Business Bureau to quickly resolve concerns reported by customers. That arrangement, though, covers only the Sierra Vista car lot and excluded the Tucson dealership at the request of the Johnstons' attorney, said Collier, the BBB president.

Linton said the Army is willing to reconsider if the Johnstons can prove to commanders' satisfaction that past problems have been corrected.

Until then, she said, "we are going to protect our soldiers."

Article by Carol Ann Alaimo and ShelleyShelton
Arizona Daily Star

Are you the victim of auto dealer fraud in Arizona?





Labels: , ,

Thursday, July 17, 2008

The Lemon law - Do Some Homework Before Buying Used Car

First, know what it's worth. Just because the price looks good doesn't mean the vehicle may not need some repair work. The Kelley Blue Book and N.A.D.A. Appraisal Guides have been the standard for determining car values for years, and now you can check prices online at www.kbb.com or nadaguides.com. Secondly, know the vehicle's history. If you have the vehicle identification number, you can use a service such as Carfax to purchase a history report on that vehicle. However, the report will only show what has been reported to insurance companies or government agencies. If the vehicle was in a flood, for example, and this was not reported, that information won't show up. Go to www.carfax.com or AAA.com.

Next, check the mileage and gauge it against what you see. If the odometer shows 5,000 miles, for example, but the pedal pads are worn out, that's a clue. Also, look for doorjamb stickers or papers in the glove compartment that may contradict the mileage.

Check tire wheels or rims for marks from wheel weights. The more marks, the more often the tires have been balanced, indicating age. Has the vehicle just been completely repainted? If the mileage is low, this may mean it has been in a wreck. On the other hand, if the vehicle is older, a new paint job may have been called for.

Turn the key on with the engine off and compare the warning lights you see with what the owner's manual says you should be seeing.

If any warning light doesn't work, a different warning light should go on — the one in your head. Someone may have tampered with the vehicle to hide a problem.

Finally, have the car thoroughly examined by an auto technician you trust. If the car's owner or salesperson won't let you have the vehicle checked, pass on it — they're hiding something.

Most dealers provide at least some level of warranty on their used cars. Read the fine print carefully. And consider an aftermarket warranty to further protect yourself. If you're buying from an individual, you're totally on your own from the moment you take possession.

Article by Chuck Mai

NewsOK.com

Research the lemon laws in your state.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, June 26, 2008

Former Car Dealer Pleads Guilty to 5 Fraud Charges, Agrees to Pay $142,626

A former Waynesboro car dealer facing a slew of charges alleging fraudulent business practices pleaded guilty Monday to five misdemeanor counts and agreed to pay $142,626 in restitution to past customers in a deal with prosecutors to avoid jail time.


Rodney Price, 42, owner of RSD Motors – located on Apple Tree Lane until it was shut down in March – was originally charged with 33 misdemeanor counts of selling a vehicle without a title, two misdemeanor counts of improper registration material, four felony charges of disposing of mortgaged property, three felony counts of obtaining money under false pretenses and one felony count of embezzlement, according to court documents.


Prosecutors later streamlined the case to focus on five RSD customers who never received titles to vehicles they purchased – the same complaint voiced by dozens of the dealership’s other customers, Assistant Commonwealth’s Attorney Jim Camblos said. In most of those cases, Price neglected to pay off old loans on used vehicles before selling them to new owners – this meant the previous owners still had the outstanding loan under their names, and the new owners were unable to obtain car insurance or legal titles.


In some cases, Price also neglected to pay state taxes, Camblos said.
“He wasn’t minding the store ... ,” Camblos said. “He wasn’t taking care of business with Richmond, he was not paying off loans and he was causing a lot of havoc for a lot of customers.”
Under the terms of the deal with prosecutors, Price pleaded guilty to five misdemeanor counts of fraudulently selling a motor vehicle, with six-month jail sentences for each charge suspended on the condition that he pay the $142,626 in restitution within a two-year period.


Several former customers were on hand Monday to witness Price’s day in court. While most felt the agreement was in their best interest and would expedite financial compensation, some said it was also difficult to accept.


“I felt sorry for him until he got to walk through that door,” said Waynesboro resident Pat Templeton as she gestured toward the courthouse parking lot. Templeton said she payed Price cash several months ago for a 1996 Jeep, but still lacks the vehicle’s title.


Sonya Mays, of Waynesboro, said she had to let the 2001 Ford Windstar she purchased at RSD Motors sit unused for months because she didn’t have its title. “We’ve been making payments for five months on a vehicle we just started driving 30 days ago,” Mays said.


Camblos said the plea deal was reached in part because Price had no prior criminal record.

Story by Cleve Wiese, NewsVirginian.com

Victim of Auto Fraud? Find a consumer lawyer to help you!

Labels: , ,

Home Find A Lemon Law Lawyer Manufacturer Recalls & Bulletins Vehicle Repair Logs & Tips Free Lemon Law Case Review